<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace Collection:</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10174/14329</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 05:29:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-07-31T05:29:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Game Theoretical Aspects Towards a Sustainable Path to Fight Climate Change</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10174/39607</link>
      <description>Title: Game Theoretical Aspects Towards a Sustainable Path to Fight Climate Change
Authors: Rocha de Sousa, Miguel
Abstract: We provide a new form of re-globalization tackling the aspects of climate change&#xD;
by addressing it through a theoretical approach rooted in game theory. A first holistic&#xD;
game of Berlin—between the individual and the group—is presented, grounded&#xD;
in Isaiah Berlin’s (Berlin (1961)) concepts of negative and positive liberty. Next, we&#xD;
generalize a non-cooperative game of climate change. Building on an evolutionary&#xD;
game theory approach (Caleiro et al., 2019), we propose a novel framework. We&#xD;
then explore cooperative games and introduce the notion of Kantian equilibrium&#xD;
as developed by Roemer (2019). Finally, we discuss the intertemporal politicaleconomic&#xD;
approach to climate change in the context of an overlapping generations&#xD;
(OLG) model, as in Rocha de Sousa and Pica (2023). We conclude with conjectures&#xD;
on global climate governance, drawing from simulations of global ecological&#xD;
footprints (Araújo et al., 2025).</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 23:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/10174/39607</guid>
      <dc:date>2025-06-30T23:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>An OLG model approach to climate change with intergenerational concern and Game Theory</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10174/37128</link>
      <description>Title: An OLG model approach to climate change with intergenerational concern and Game Theory
Authors: Rocha de Sousa, Miguel; Pica, António
Abstract: Udalov 2014 extended a collective goods problem through an Overlapping Generations Model where there&#xD;
is a decision regarding the type of energy use either fossil fuel versus renewable use energy Udalov&#xD;
introduced a politico economic equilibrium contingent on the effort or commitment on renewable energy We&#xD;
provide his framework but further extended it, by using an eta parameter which provides intergenerational&#xD;
concern among different generations, old versus youngsters We depart from non existent Udalov non&#xD;
concern of intergenerational generations, and extend it to use a parameter eta which reflects this concern&#xD;
We further provide a game, in the sense of game theory, where the politico economic equilibrium is&#xD;
contingent on the intergenerational concern, which reflects strategic interaction among youngsters and old&#xD;
people Some politico economic results at hand As higher intergenerational concern eta parameter a tribute&#xD;
to Stern’s 2004 report the faster the pace of recuperation of a global common good the lower level of&#xD;
pollution and politico economic equilibria recovers the fastest ( the investment in renewable energy</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jul 2023 23:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/10174/37128</guid>
      <dc:date>2023-07-20T23:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kant vs Nash: Solving the Global Commons Goods Problem</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10174/37125</link>
      <description>Title: Kant vs Nash: Solving the Global Commons Goods Problem
Authors: Rocha de Sousa, Miguel; Duarte, Vanessa
Abstract: We provide the notion of Kantian equilibrium versus Nash equilibrium, and try to recover the efficiency of Pareto&#xD;
allocations within public goods (global commons) and external effects (like pollution) Nash 1950 a,b) provided the first solution to&#xD;
a non zero sum non cooperative game through a fixed point theorem Nevertheless, market efficiency is not recovered when there&#xD;
are either externalities (like pollution, or the global common problems), or common public goods Ostrom 1989 provided a&#xD;
solution in small numbers through cooperation in small lake ponds and lobsters aquaculture production and local water provision&#xD;
Roemer 1992 studied theories of distributive justice and came forth with a solution to global commons problem of environment&#xD;
and pollution ( 2019 Nevertheless, Roemer’s solution, while solving the global commons incentive problem, by thinking&#xD;
out of the box, and providing a new framework provides a too much collective solution We provide instead a communitarian&#xD;
solution, inspired by Christian ethics, namely Economics of Francis, Laudatio si which also recovers the global incentive problem,&#xD;
but provides a different politico economic perspective.</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2023 23:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/10174/37125</guid>
      <dc:date>2023-07-16T23:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Kant vs Nash: Solving the Global Commons Goods Problem</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/10174/37124</link>
      <description>Title: Kant vs Nash: Solving the Global Commons Goods Problem
Authors: Rocha de Sousa, Miguel; Duarte, Vanessa
Abstract: We provide the notion of Kantian equilibrium versus Nash equilibrium, a try to recover the efficiency of Pareto allocations within public goods (global commons) and external effects (like pollution). Nash (1950a,b) provided the first solution to a non zero-sum  non-cooperative game through a fixed point theorem. Nevertheless, market efficiency is not recovered when there are either externalities (like pollution, or the global common problems and goods), or common public goods. Ostrom (1989) provided a solution in small numbers through cooperation in small lake ponds and lobsters aquaculture production and local water provision. &#xD;
&#xD;
Roemer (1992) studied theories of distributive justice and came forth with a solution to global commons problem of environment and pollution (Roemer, 2019). Nevertheless, Roemer’s solution, while solving the global commons incentive problem, by thinking out of the box, and providing a new framework provides a too much collective solution. We provide instead a communitarian solution, inspired Christian ethics, namely Economy of Francis, Laudation si, which also recovers the global incentive problem, but provides a different politico economic perspective.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2023 23:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/10174/37124</guid>
      <dc:date>2023-07-19T23:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

