Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/41289
|
| Title: | What are the barriers and facilitators on the acceptance of information and communication technology-based interventions for improving resilience and mental health of healthcare workers: A scoping review protocol |
| Authors: | Alves, Elisabete Rodrigues, Ricardo Fonseca, César Lopes, Manuel Faria, Inês Pinho, Lara |
| Issue Date: | 2025 |
| Abstract: | Introduction Healthcare workers (HCWs) report
overwhelming demands and experience crisis levels
of burnout and unique challenges that further impair
their mental health. Promotion of mental health among
HCWs using information and communication technology
(ICT) has received little empirical research attention and
interventions for improving mental health resilience in
HCWs are not well established.
Design Scoping review to map existing evidence and
identify gaps for future research regarding the main
barriers and facilitators of the acceptance of ICT- based
interventions for improving resilience and mental health
among HCWs working in all healthcare settings.
Methods and analysis This protocol was developed in
accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic
Reviews and Meta- Analyses extension for Scoping
Reviews guidelines. A comprehensive bibliographic search
will be conducted between October 2024 and October
2025 in Pubmed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Scopus,
Cochrane Library and CINAHL Ultimate (MedicLatina,
Psychology and Behavioural Sciences Collection),
with the assistance of a qualified research librarian, to
retrieve studies describing data on the main barriers and
facilitators to the acceptance of ICT- based interventions
for improving resilience and mental health among HCWs
working in healthcare settings. There will be no restrictions
based on date of publication or language. Inclusion and
exclusion criteria will be defined for each element of the
PICO(D) framework, and both quantitative and qualitative
data will be extracted. Quality will be assessed using
the mixed methods assessment tool. Two independent
investigators will perform the eligibility assessment and
data extraction, and any disagreements will be resolved
by a third reviewer. The main results will be narratively
synthesised and analysed. |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10174/41289 |
| Type: | article |
| Appears in Collections: | CHRC - Publicações - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais Com Arbitragem Científica
|
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|